COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF MONOPOLAR AND BIPOLAR TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF THE PROSTATE
https://doi.org/10.17021/2019.14.2.81.86
Аннотация
The article discusses the author’s experience with monopolar (M-TURP) and bipolar (B-TURP) transurethral resection (TUR) of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) performed in a total of 49 patients, approximately the same number of patients in each group, in three private clinics. Information from modern urological literature on the technical characteristics of operations, indications and complications are given. The main purpose of the article is to give recommendations to general practitioners and novice urologists for adequate preparation of patients with BPH for TUR of prostate surgery, optimization of the choice of endourological instruments and irrigation solutions, taking into account reduction of intraoperative complications. It has been revealed that with a large prostate gland (> 70 g), bipolar resection of the prostate gland is a relatively safe method of resection compared with monopolar resection, taking into account the risk of TUR syndrome. It is confirmed that epidural anesthesia is preferable to spinal one, especially in simultaneous operations, taking into account the control of postoperative pain. Antibacterial treatment 24 hours before surgery reduces the risk of developing postoperative infection in patients with acute urinary retention and / or when handling the Foley catheter in situ. In this study, no significantly higher urethral stricture frequency has been found in the bipolar group. It has also been established that chronic urinary tract infections (chronic epididymitis, chronic prostatitis) in elderly men are not a contraindication for performing surgically “clean” operations in the inguinal-scrotal region.
Об авторе
P. Nasirov
Azerbaijan State Advanced Training Institute for Doctors named after A. Aliyev
Россия
Россия
Список литературы
1. Leshchenko I. G., Bratchikov O. I., Slivkin V. V., Shumakova Ye. A., Krechko N. A., Lazarev I. Yu., Shatokhina I. V. Klassifikatsiya simul'tannykh operatsiy u urologicheskikh bol'nykh pozhilogo i starcheskogo vozrasta [Classification of simultaneous operations of urological patients of old and gerontic age]. Meditsinskiy al'manakh [Medical Almanac], 2014, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 149-153.
2. Lopatkin N. A. Urologiya. Sed'moye izdaniye [Urology. Seventh edition], Moscow, Medicine, 2013, 539 p.
3. Pushkar' D. Yu., Govorov A. V., Sidorenkov A. V., Prilepskaya Ye. A., Kovylina M. V. Rannyaya diagnostika raka predstatel'noy zhelezy. Metodicheskiye rekomendatsii № 19 [Early diagnosis of prostate cancer. Methodical recommendations № 19]. Moscow, ABV-press, 2015, 52 p.
4. Sergiyenko N. F., Begayev A. I., Vasil'chenko M. I., Bratchikov O. I. Oshibki i oslozhneniya transuretral'noy rezektsii predstatel'noy zhelezy pri adenome. 2-ye izdaniye dopolnennoye [Errors and complications of transurethral resection of the prostate gland in adenoma. 2nd edition enlarged]. Moscow, Binom, 2013, 112 p.
5. Stus' V. P., Osenniy I. A. Ispol'zovaniye Turusola pri transuretral'noy rezektsii opukholey predstatel'noy zhelezy i mochevogo puzyrya [The use of Turusol in the transurethral resection of prostate and bladder tumors]. Zdorov'ye muzhchiny [Men's Health], 2012, no. 1, pp. 35-37.
6. Ul'trazvukovaya diagnostika v urologii [Practical Urological Ultrasound]. Ed. Fulgham P. F., Gilbert B. R. Translated from English by K.A. Shiranov. Ed. A.V. Zubarev, D.Yu. Pushkar’. Moscow, Geotar-Media, 2016, 328 p.
7. Shirokorad V. I. Khirurgicheskoye lecheniye mestno rasprostranennykh opukholey organov malogo taza [Surgical treatment of locally advanced tumors of the pelvic organs]. Мoscow, Medicine, 2008, 192 p.
8. Wein A. J., Kavoussi L. R., Novick A. C., Partin A. W., Peters C. А. Campbell-Walsh Urology (9th Edition). Saunders, 2006, 4592 p.
9. Chapple Cr. Overview of evidence for contemporary management of lower urinary tract symptoms presumed due to benign prostatic hyperplasia males. European Urology Supplements, 2010, vol. 9, issue 4, pp. 482-485.
10. Hohenfellner R., Stolzenburg J-U. Manual of Endourology. Training for residents. Springer, 2005, 117 p.
11. Smith J. A., Smith J. Jr., Howards S. S., Preminger G. M. Hinman’s Atlas of Urologic Surgery (3rd edition). Elsevier Saunders, 2012, 1184 p.
12. Kirk R. M., Mansfield A. O., Cochrane J. P. S. Clinical Surgery in General. RCS Course Manual (3rd edition). London, Churchill Livingstone, 1999, 453 p.
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
. Астраханский медицинский журнал. 2019;14(2):81-86. https://doi.org/10.17021/2019.14.2.81.86
For citation:
Nasirov P.R. COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF MONOPOLAR AND BIPOLAR TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF THE PROSTATE. Astrakhan medical journal. 2019;14(2):81-86. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17021/2019.14.2.81.86
Просмотров:
138
Послать статью по эл. почте 