CASES OF PRESERVATION OF REPRODUCTIVE FUNCTION IN WOMEN WITH PERITONITIS AFTER CESAREAN SECTION
https://doi.org/10.48612/agmu/2022.17.4.137.144
Abstract
The article describes two clinical cases of performing organ-preserving operations with the dehiscence of sutures on the uterus after cesarean section and the development of peritonitis. The possibility of organ-preserving technology in the absence of symptoms of multiple organ failure is substantiated. A method of performing a metroplasty operation with the use of a modified method of lymphotropic therapy in the postoperative period is proposed. A favorable catamnesis of operated maternity hospitals is presented.
Keywords
obstetric peritonitis,
uterine suture dehiscence,
cesarean section,
metroplasty,
lymphotropic therapy
Supporting agencies: The authors declare that there is no external funding for the exploration and analysis work.
About the Author
A. Sh. Dabusov
Dagestan State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Abakar Sh. Dabuzov, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Assistant
Makhachkala
References
1. Adamyan L. V., Artymuk N. V., Belokrinickaya T. E., Gel'fand B. R., Kulikov A. V., et al. Septic complications in obstetrics. Clinical recommendations (treatment protocol). Moskva, 2017. 59 p. (In Russ.).
2. Zharkin N.A., Logutova L.S., Semihova T.G. Kesarevo sechenie: medicinskie, social'nye i moral'no-eticheskie problem [Caesarean section: medical, social and moral-ethical problems]. Rossiyskiy vestnik akushera-ginekologa = Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2019; 19 (4): 5–10. doi:10.17116/rosakush2019190415. (In Russ.).
3. Chebbo A., Tan S., Kassis C., Tamura L., Carlos R.W. Maternal Sepsis and Septic Shok. Critical care clinics. 2016; 32 (1): 119–135. doi:10.1016/j.ccc.2015.08.010.
4. Belokrinitskaia T. E., Frolova N. I. Prevention of septic complications in obstetrics: the guidelines of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation and the World Health Organization 2015. Rossiyskiy vestnik akusheraginekologa = Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2016; 16 (3): 79–84. (In Russ.).
5. Samchuk P. M., Ishchenko A. I., Rozalieva Yu. Yu. Organ-preserving tekynology in case of purulent inflammatory complications of CS. Voprosi gynecologii, akusherstva I perinatologii. 2020; 19 (2): 96–103. (In Russ.).
6. Sartelli M., Weber D. G., Ruppé E., Bassetti M., Wright B. J., Ansaloni L., Catena F., Coccolini F., Abu-Zidan F.M., et al. Antimicrobials: a global alliance for optimizing their rational use in intra-abdominal infections (AGORA) // World journal of emergency surgery. 2016; 11: 33. doi: 10.1186/s13017-016-0089-y.
7. National Guideline Centre (UK)/ Sepsis: Recognition, Assesment and Early Management. London: National Institute for Heakth and Care Excellence (UK); 2016. 50 p.
8. Arulkumaran N., Singer M. Puerperial sepsis // Best practice and research. Clinical obstetrics and gynaecology. 2013; 27 (6): 893–902. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2013.07.004.
9. Ryzhkov V. V., Khazhbiev A. A. Prevention of purulent-septic complications after cesarean section. Tavricheskiy mediko-biologicheskiy vestnik. 2017; 20 (2-2): 190-197. (In Russ.).
10. Ishchenko A. I., Davydov A. I., Aleksandrov L. S., Pashkov V. M., Ishchenko A. A., Khokhlova I. D., Dzhibladze T. A., Gorbenko O. Yu., Bryunin D. V., Ptashinskaya V. A., Tarasenko Yu. N., Tairova M. B. Uterine scar incompetency after the cesarean section. choice of surgical intervention method. Voprosy ginekologii, akusherstva i perinatologii = Gynecology, Obstetrics and Perinatology. 2018; 17 (4): 51–59. doi: 10.20953/1726-1678-2018-4-51-59. (In Russ.).
11. Shchukina N. A., Buianova S. N., Chechneva M. A., Budykina T. S., Blagina E. I., Sibryaeva V. A. Organsparing surgery in a patient with necrotic endometritis and an incompetent uterine scar after cesarean section. Rossiyskiy vestnik akushera-ginekologa = Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2016; 16 (4): 80–84. (In Russ.).
12. Ryskel'dieva V. T., Dzhumalieva A. D. Organ-preserving treatment of obstetric peritonitis in case of failure of the suture on the uterus after cesarean section. Vestnik kyrgyzsko-rossiyskogo slavyanskogo universiteta = Bulletin of the Kyrgyz-Russian Slavic University. 2018; 18 (6): 78–82. (In Russ.).
13. Zharkin N. A., Prokhvatilov S. V., Burova N. A., Gavril'chuk T. K., Mudraya E. V., Snigur G. L. Surgical reconstruction of a scar on the uterus during pregnancy. Indications, conditions and risks. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya = Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2018; (10): 142–147. (In Russ.).
14. Sarbasova A. E., Sinchikhin S. P., Stepanyan L. V., Berdieva S. A., Filimonov O. Yu. Methods to reduce blood loss at cesarean section. Astrakhanskiy meditsinskiy zhurnal = Astrkhan Medical Journal. 2016; 11 (4): 37–43. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Dabusov A.Sh. CASES OF PRESERVATION OF REPRODUCTIVE FUNCTION IN WOMEN WITH PERITONITIS AFTER CESAREAN SECTION. Astrakhan medical journal. 2022;17(4):137-144. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.48612/agmu/2022.17.4.137.144
Views:
383
Email this article 