DIAGNOSTIC, TACTICAL AND DEONTOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF THE PROBLEM OF ACUTE SURGICAL PATHOLOGY OF ABDOMINAL ORGANS IN PREGNANT WOMEN
https://doi.org/10.48612/agmu/2022.17.4.16.24
Abstract
Acute surgical pathology in pregnant women is a serious interdisciplinary problem. Anatomical and physiological features associated with pregnancy lead to a shortage of diagnostic information: "habitual" clinical symptoms and laboratory signs become uninformative, and the use of instrumental imaging methods is limited by contraindications. This makes it much more difficult to make a decision, both about regard to surgical and obstetric tactics. Increased responsibility and the moral and ethical side of making such a decision require holding consultations with the most experienced specialists. With the improvement of modern technologies for pathogenetic correction of manifestations of combined toxicosis, the role of the use of extracorporeal detoxification methods in pregnant women with surgical pathology requires clarification. With abdominal delivery of patients operated on during pregnancy for acute abdominal pathology, the technique of extraperitoneal interventions is becoming increasingly widespread. The problem of long-term results of surgical diseases during pregnancy, quality of life and fertility in this group of patients requires study.
Supporting agencies: The authors declare that there is no external funding for the exploration and analysis work.
About the Authors
Yu. R. Molchanova
Astrakhan State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Yuliya. R. Molchanova, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor of the Department
Astrakhan
R. D. Mustafin
Astrakhan State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Robert. D. Mustafin, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Head of Department
Astrakhan
References
1. Dubeyko D. M., Stolbanov E. A. Acute surgical pathology in pregnant women. Molodoy uchenyy = Young Scientist. 2018; 12 (198): 69–71. (In Russ.).
2. Klimovich I. I., Strapko V. P., Oganesyan A. S. Acute surgical diseases in pregnant women, particularities of diagnostics and curative tactic. Materials of republic scientific conference with international participation “Actual issues of obstetrics and gynecology”. 20-21 October 2011. Grodno; 2011: 73–75. (In Russ.).
3. Sych T. Yu. Obstetrical and surgical tactic in pregnant women with acute surgical pathology in III trimester of pregnancy. Abstract of thesis of Candidate of Medical Sciences. Moscow; 2018. 25 p. (In Russ.)
4. Hvorostuhina, N. F. Obstetrical tactic in acute surgical diseases of abdominal cavity organs. Thesis of Doctor of Medical Sciences. Saratov; 2015. 348 p. (In Russ.).
5. Bouyou J., Gaujoux S., Marcellin L. Abdominal emergencies during pregnancy. Journal of visceral surgery. 2015; 152 (6): 105–115.
6. Friel L.A. Maladies qui nécessitent une intervention chirurgicale pendant la grossesse. URL: https://www.msdmanuals.com/fr/professional/gyn%C3%A9cologie-et-obst%C3%A9trique/grossesse-compliqu%C3%A9e-par-une-maladie/affections-chirurgicales-pendant-la-grossesse
7. Augustin G. Acute abdomen during pregnancy. Springer; 2019. 840 p.
8. Pokharel H. P., Dahal P., Rai R., Budhathoki S. Surgical Emergencies in Obstetrics and Gynaecology in a Tertiary Care Hospital. Journal of the Nepal Medical Association. 2013; 52 (189): 213–216.
9. Skubic J. J., Salim A. Emergency general surgery in pregnancy. Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open. 2017; 2: 1–5. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2017-000125.
10. Zachariah S. K., Fenn M., Jacob K., Arthungal S. A., Zachariah S. A. Management of acute abdomen in pregnancy: current perspectives. International Journal of Women’s Health. 2019; 11: 119–134.
11. Zonča P., Ihnát P., Peteja M. Operace v těhotenství pro náhlé příhody břišní z pohledu chirurga [Acute abdominal surgery in pregnancy - as viewed by the surgeon]. Rozhledy v chirurgii : měsíčník Československé chirurgické společnosti. 2015; 94: 229–233.
12. Bezhenar' V. F., Korol'kov A. Yu., Ul'chenko V. Yu., Teplov V. M., Kitaeva M. A., Arakelyan B. V., Cickarava D. Z., Smirnov D. A., Cebrovskaya E. A., Bol'shakova M. V., Bagnenko S. F. Routing of pregnant women at different gestational ages with suspected acute surgical pathology in a multidisciplinary hospital. Skoraya medicinskaya pomoshch' = Urgent Medical Aid. 2017; 18 (4): 48–52. (In Russ.).
13. Hasanov A. G., Zhuravlev I. A., Badretdinova F. F., Nurieva A. R., Mamedova O. K. New and old views on the problem of acute appendicitis during pregnancy (literature review). Nauchnoe obozrenie. Meditsinskie nauki = Scientific Review. Medical Sciences. 2016; (1): 40-48. (In Russ.).
14. Shaymardanov R. Sh., Gumarov R. F. Instrumental research methods in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in pregnant women. Kazanskiy Meditsinskiy Zhurnal = Kazan Medical Journal. 2010; 91 (5): 622–625. (In Russ.).
15. Shulyak G. D. Optimization of diagnostic and therapeutic tactics in acute appendicitis during pregnancy. Thesis of Candidate of Medical Sciences. Moscow; 2019. 115 p. (In Russ.).
16. Cilo N. B., Amini D., Landy H. J. Appendicitis and cholecystitis in pregnancy. Clinical obstetrics and gynecology. 2009; 52 (4): 586–596.
17. Perdue P. W., Johnson H. W. Jr, Stafford P. W. I ntestinal obstruction complicating pregnancy. American Journal of Surgery. 1992; 164 (4): 384–388.
18. Lebedenko E. Yu., Mihel'son A. F., Rozenberg I. M. Dangerous past, difficult present, vague future for patients who survived obstetric disasters ("near miss"). Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal prikladnyh i fundamental'nyh issledovaniy = International Journal of Applied and Fundamental Research. 2015; (3-3): 372–377. (In Russ.).
19. Olenev A. S. Reserves for reducing maternal mortality in a metropolis. Thesis of Doctor of Medical Sciences. Moscow; 2022. 362 p. (In Russ.).
20. Alekseeva T. A. Pathogenetic significance of disorders of the motor-evacuation function of the intestine as a factor that aggravates the course of pregnancy. Thesis of Candidate of Medical Sciences. Moscow; 2009. 123 p. (In Russ.).
21. Kitaeva M. A., Korolkov A. Yu., Bezhenar V. F., Smirnov D. A., Popov D. N., Bagnenko S .F. Surgical tactics in complications of gallstone disease in pregnant women at late stages of gestation. Grekov's Bulletin of Surgery. 2018; 177 (3):45–48. (In Russ.).
22. Styazhkina S. N., Ledneva A. V., Tret'yakov E. V., Korobeynikov V. I., Vinohodova E. M., Chernenkova M. L., Sultanova M. V. Acute pancreatitis in pregnant women and in the early postpartum period with metabolic syndrome. Annaly khirurgicheskoy gepatologii = Annals of Surgical Hepatology. 2013; 18 (1): 112–116. (In Russ.).
23. Dhupar R., Simaldone G. M., Hamad G. G. Is there a benefit to delaying cholecystectomy for symptomatic gallbladder disease during pregnancy? Surgical endoscopy. 2010; 24 (1): 108–112.
24. Aylamazyan E. K., Cvelev Yu. V. Patient's rights, medical ethics and legal responsibility of obstetriciansgynecologists (results of the discussion). Zhurnal akusherstva i zhenskikh olezney = Journal of Obstetrics and Women's Diseases. 2005; 54 (4): 93–99. (In Russ.).
25. Obstetrics: national leadership: textbook, ed. E. K. Ailamazyan. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2009. 1200 p. (In Russ.).
26. Davydov S. N. Deontology in obstetrics and gynecology. Leningrad: Medicina; 1979. 144 p. (In Russ.).
27. Semenova E. S., Mashchenko I. A., Trufanov G. E., Fokin V. A., Efimtsev A. Yu., Lepekhina A. S., Gorbunova E. A., Sergienya O. V., Shmedyk N. Yu., Tilloev T. A Magnetic resonance imaging during pregnancy: current safety issues. Rossiyskiy elektronnyy zhurnal luchevoy diagnostiki = REJR. 2020; 10 (1): 216–230. (In Russ.).
28. Pedrosa I., Levine D., Eyvazzadeh A. D., Siewert B., Ngo L., Rofsky N. M. MR imaging Evaluation of acute appendicitis in pregnancy. Radiology. 2006; 238 (3): 891–899.
29. Korotkevich A. G., Zlobina L. A., Revickaya Yu. Yu. Diagnostic laparoscopy technique in pregnant women. Endoskopicheskaya khirurgiya = Endoscopic Surgery. 2010; 16 (2): 37–41. (In Russ.).
30. Fedorov I. V., Mazitova M. I. Laparoscopic surgery and pregnancy. Endoskopicheskaya khirurgiya = Endoscopic Surgery. 2010; 16 (5): 59–62. (In Russ.).
31. Khat’kov I. E., Chudnykh S. M., Aliev É. S. Laparoscopy in diagnosis and treatment of acute abdominal diseases while pregnant: advantages, drawbacks, complications and prognosis (literature review). Endoskopicheskaya khirurgiya = Endoscopic Surgery. 2011; 17 (4): 43-49. (In Russ.).
32. Cheng H. T., Wang Y. C., Lo H. C. Laparoscopic appendectomy versus open appendectomy in pregnancy: a population-based analysis of maternal outcome. Surgical endoscopy. 2015; 29 (6): 1394–1399.
33. Fozan H. A., Tulandi T. Safety and risks of laparoscopy in pregnancy. Current opinion in obstetrics and gynecology. 2002; 14 (4): 375–379.
34. Barnes S. L., Shane M. D., Schoemann M. B., Bernard A. C., Boulanger B.R. Laparoscopic appendectomy after 30 week pregnancy: report of two cases and description of technique. The American surgeon. 2004; 70 (8): 733–736.
35. Kocael P. C., Simsek O., Saribeyoglu K., Pekmezci S., Goksoy E. Laparoscopic surgery in pregnant patients with acute abdomen. Annali Italiani di chirurgia. 2015; 86 (2): 137–142.
36. Sadot E., Telem D. A., Arora M., Butala P., Nguyen S. Q., Divino C. M. Laparoscopy: a safe approach to appendicitis during pregnancy. Surgical endoscopy. 2010; 24 (2): 383–389.
37. Sedaghat N., Cao A.M., Eslick G. D., Cox M. R. Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgical endoscopy. 2016; 31 (2): 673–679.
38. Wilasrusmee C., Sukrat B., McEvoy M., Attia J., Thakkinstian A. Systematic review and meta-analysis of safety of laparoscopic versus open appendecectomy for suspected appendicitis in pregnancy. The British Journal of Surgery. 2012; 99 (11): 1470–1479.
39. Dabuzov A. Sh., Abdurahmanova R. A., Babaeva S. A. Preservation of reproductive function in patients with peritonitis after cesarean section. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya = Modern Problems of Science and Education. 2017; 1. URL: https://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=25896. (In Russ.).
40. Zharkin N. A., Logutova L. S., Semikhova T. G. Cesarean section: medical, social and moral-ethical problems. Rossiyskiy vestnik akushera-ginekologa = Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2019; 19 (4): 5–10. (In Russ.).
41. Radzinskij V. E. Obstetric aggression. Moscow: Status Praesens; 2017. 872 p. (In Russ.).
42. Kokhanov A. V., Sukharev A. E., Yampolskaya I. S., Kriventsev Yu. A., Lutseva O. A. The placental isoform of alkaline phosphatase and scientific heritage of professor R.I. Asfandiyarov. Astrakhanskiy meditsinskiy zhurnal = Astrakhan Medical Journal. 2013; 8 (1): 133–137. (In Russ.).
43. Kchibekov E. A. Diagnostic and prognostic role of metalloproteins in acute appendicitis. Vestnik Natsional'nogo mediko-khirurgicheskogo tsentra im. N.I. Pirogova = Bulletin of Pirogov National Medical and Surgical Center. 2010; 5 (3): 104–105. (In Russ.).
44. Styazhkina S. N., Varganov M. V., Ledneva A. V., Nazarov S. B., Vinohodova E. M., Chernenkova M. L., Tret'yakov E. V., Sultanova M. V. Clinical and immunological parallels of the use of efferent methods in the treatment of purulent-inflammatory diseases in surgical and gynecological practice. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya = Modern Problems of Science and Education. 2013; 2. URL: https://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=8644. (In Russ.).
45. Fomin A. M., Titova G. V. Selective plasmasorption and plasma exchange in liver failure in patients with mechanical jaundice. Anesteziologiya i reanimatologiya = Russian Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimatology. 2018; (5): 91–98. (In Russ.).
46. Krasnopol'skiy V. I., Mel'nikov A. P., Petruhin V. A., Karamyan R. A. Extraperitoneal caesarean section: place of operation in the world and in domestic obstetrics. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya = Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2020; (9): 11–17. (In Russ.).
47. Velemir L. La césarienne extrapéritonéale ambulatoire à la française: vers une césarienne sans douleurs. URL : https://www.drvelemir.fr/actualites/la-cesarienne-extraperitoneale-ambulatoire-a-la-francaise.
48. Sharma P.P., Gond S., Ansari M.D.K., Madhuri N., Bera S.N. Extraperitoneal cesarean section: a retrospective analysis // Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 9: 1089–1091.
Review
For citations:
Molchanova Yu.R., Mustafin R.D. DIAGNOSTIC, TACTICAL AND DEONTOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF THE PROBLEM OF ACUTE SURGICAL PATHOLOGY OF ABDOMINAL ORGANS IN PREGNANT WOMEN. Astrakhan medical journal. 2022;17(4):16-24. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.48612/agmu/2022.17.4.16.24
Views:
419
Email this article 