Comparative evaluation of culture media for cultivation of Mycobacterium smegmatis mc²155 in the assessment of antimycobacterial activity
https://doi.org/10.17021/1992-6499-2026-2-68-75
Abstract
The growing prevalence of drug-resistant mycobacteria, including non-tuberculous species, highlights the urgent need for novel therapeutic approaches, among which phage therapy represents a promising strategy. However, the efficacy of antimycobacterial agents is critically dependent on cultivation conditions, making the choice of an optimal culture medium and a reliable model strain (Mycobacterium smegmatis mc²155) essential for accurate activity assessment and the development of effective therapeutics. The aim of the study was to conduct a comparative evaluation of the efficacy of culture media for cultivation of the reference strain Mycobacterium smegmatis mc²155 and for maintaining antimycobacterial activity. Materials and methods. The reference strain Mycobacterium smegmatis mc²155 was used in this study. Inoculations were performed on liquid media: Middlebrook 7H9 supplemented with 10% oleic acid–albumin– dextrose–catalase enrichment and Tween 80, Shkolnikova medium, Sauton's medium, and a modified medium with reduced salt content enriched with glucose and yeast extract. A bacteriophage lysate obtained from a compost sample by enrichment culture on M. smegmatis mc²155 was used as a standardized indicator of lytic activity. The phage lysate titer was 3.7∙107 plaque-forming units per milliliter. Antimycobacterial activity was assessed by adding 0.25 mL of bacterial culture of M. smegmatis mc²155 (final concentration 3.7∙108 colony-forming units per milliliter) and 0.25 mL of phage lysate to tubes containing 5 mL of the corresponding medium. Results. In Middlebrook 7H9 and modified broth supplemented with phage lysate, a decrease in optical density was observed as early as 4 hours, progressing by 48 hours (0.009 ± 0.028). Both media demonstrated a heterogeneous response: in 9 out of 10 replicates, optical density decreased to 0.008–0.009, while in one replicate it remained high (0.080–0.107), indicating the survival of a cell subpopulation, potentially attributable to persister formation or transition to pseudolysogeny. By contrast, no significant decrease in optical density was recorded in Shkolnikova and Sauton's media (optical density remained at 0.168–0.237). Statistical analysis confirmed no significant differences between Middlebrook 7H9 and modified broth (p = 0.92), while both media significantly outperformed Shkolnikova and Sauton's media (p < 0.001). Conclusion. The modified broth is not inferior to the commercial Middlebrook 7H9 medium in supporting antimycobacterial activity (p > 0.05) and may serve as a cost-effective alternative for phage research. These findings underscore the need for standardization of culture media in antimycobacterial activity evaluation and open up opportunities for optimizing screening protocols.
Keywords
About the Authors
G. N. GenatullinaRussian Federation
Guzel N. Genatullina - Cand. Sci. (Biol.), Associate Professor, Deputy Head of the Research Center, Associate Professor of the Department, Astrakhan State Medical University.
Astrakhan
A. A. Tsibizova
Russian Federation
Alexandra A. Tsibizova - Cand. Sci. (Pharm.), Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department, Astrakhan State Medical University.
Astrakhan
A. L. Yasenyavskaya
Russian Federation
Anna L. Yasenyavskaya - Dr. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor, Head of the Scientific Research Center, Head of the Department, Astrakhan State Medical University.
Astrakhan
S. V. Poroyskiy
Russian Federation
Sergey V. Poroyskiy - Dr. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor, Head of the Department, Astrakhan State Medical University.
Astrakhan
M. A. Samotrueva
Russian Federation
Marina A. Samotrueva - Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Head of the Department, Astrakhan State Medical University.
Astrakhan
M. V. Lazko
Russian Federation
Marina V. Lazko - Dr. Sci. (Biol.), Professor, Head of the Science Department, Professor of the Department, Astrakhan State Medical University.
Astrakhan
References
1. Honda J. R. Sources and transmission routes of non-tuberculosis mycobacteria in the environment. Clinics in Chest Medicine. 2023; 44: 661–674. doi: 10.1016/j.clcm.2023.08.002.
2. Bogush L. S., Slizen V. V., Davidovskaya E. I., Ivanova A. L., Nikolenko E. N., Surkova L. K. Non-tuberculous mycobacteria: the problem of drug resistance in the treatment of patients with pulmonary mycobacteriosis. Klinicheskaya infektologiya i parazitologiya = Clinical infectology and parasitology. 2024; 13 (2): 156. doi: 10.34883/PI.2025.28.4.006 (In Russ.).
3. Litvinov V. I. Non-tuberculous mycobacteria, mycobacteriosis. Vestnik Tsentralnogo nauchno-issledovatelskogo instituta tuberkuleza = Bulletin of the Central Scientific Research Institute of Tuberculosis. 2018; 2: 5–20. doi: 10.7868/S2587667818020012 (In Russ.).
4. Zeynali kelishomi F., Khanjani S., Fardsanei F., Saghi Sarabi H., Nikkhahi F., Dehghani B. Bacteriophages of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, their diversity, and potential therapeutic uses: a review. BMC Infectious Diseases. 2022; 22 (1): 957. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07944-9.
5. Zimina V. N., Degtyareva S. YU., Beloborodova E. N., Kulabuhova E. I., Rusakova L. I., Fesenko O. V. Mycobacteriosis: current state of the problem. Klinicheskaya mikrobiologiya i antimikrobnaya himioterapiya = Clinical microbiology and antimicrobial chemotherapy. 2017; 19 (4): 276–282 (In Russ.).
6. Lyukshin D. V., Borodulina E. A., Vdovina D. V., Zaytseva O. A. Non-tuberculous mycobacterioses of the lungs: problems of diagnosis and treatment. Vrach = Doctor. 2023; 34 (8): 33–39 (In Russ.).
7. Bonacorsi A., Ferretti K., Di Luca M., Rindi L. Mycobacteriophages and their use. Antibiotics. 2024; 13 (10): 926. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13100926.
8. Zaychikova M. V., Avdeev V. V., Kuznetsova S. M., Malakhova M. V., Shitikov E. A. Biodiversity and prospects for therapeutic and diagnostic use of mycobacteriophages in the Russian Federation. Infektsiya i immunitet = Infection and immunity. 2026; 16 (1): 9–24. doi: 10.15789/2220-7619-BDA-18100 (In Russ.).
9. Sparks I. L., Derbyshire K. M., Jacobs W. R. Jr., Morita Y. S. Mycobacterium smegmatis: the vanguard of mycobacteriological research. Journal of Bacteriology. 2023; 205 (1): e0033722. doi: 10.1128/jb.00337-22.
10. Hosseinipurham S., Sechi L. A. An overview of mycobacteriophages: from classification to application. Pathogens. 2022; 11 (7): 777. doi: 10.3390/pathogens11070777.
11. Kropinski A. M., Mazzocco A., Waddell T. E., Lingohr E., Johnson R. P. Enumeration of bacteriophages by the double agar overlay plaque assay. Bacteriophages: Methods and Protocols. 2009; 501: 69–76. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-164-6_7.
12. Zhirnov V. A., Netesov S. V. Import substitution in biological science and biotechnology. Voprosy virusologii = Problems of Virology. 2022; 67 (1): 7–12. doi: 10.36233/0507-4088-2022-67-1-7-12 (in Russ.).
13. Guan J., Ibarra D., and Tseng L. The role of lateral tail fibers in the infection cycle of the lambda phage. Virology. 2019; 527: 57–63. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2018.11.005.
14. Olszak T., Latka A., Roszniowski B., Valvano M. A., Drulis-Kawa Z. Phage life cycles behind bacterial biodiversity. Current medicinal chemistry. 2017; 24 (36): 3987-4001. doi: 10.2174/0929867324666170413100136.
Review
For citations:
Genatullina G.N., Tsibizova A.A., Yasenyavskaya A.L., Poroyskiy S.V., Samotrueva M.A., Lazko M.V. Comparative evaluation of culture media for cultivation of Mycobacterium smegmatis mc²155 in the assessment of antimycobacterial activity. Astrakhan medical journal. 2026;21(2):68-75. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17021/1992-6499-2026-2-68-75
JATS XML


















