INDICATORS OF THE AREAS OF AXIAL SECTIONS AND THE VOLUME OF THE ABDOMINAL CAVITY OF CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS ACCORDING TO INTRAVITAL IMAGING
https://doi.org/10.48612/agmu/2022.17.4.93.99
Abstract
The aim of the study is to determine the age and gender patterns of changes in the areas of axial slices and the volume of the abdominal cavity in children and adolescents according to the data of intravital imaging.
Material and methods. Computer tomograms of the abdominal cavity of 75 children with no apparent abdominal pathology were studied. The examined were divided into 4 age groups: the period of early childhood, the period of first childhood, the period of second childhood, and adolescence. The study was performed on 16-slice computed tomography scans with areas at the mid-vertebral bodies from ThXI to LV and abdominal volume determined. The data obtained were subjected to variational-statistical processing with the determination of the average value (M), standard error (m) and the significance of differences by the t-Student criterion.
Results. As a result of the studies revealed patterns of changes in the area and volume of the abdominal cavity among the examined. Gender differences have been established both within individual groups, and differences in indicators among girls and boys in terms of age.
Conclusion. It was found that the maximum cut area in the 1st and 2nd groups was determined at the ThXI level, and in the 3rd and 4th groups - at the ThXII level. The minimum cut area in the studied groups was determined at the LV level.
With age, a tendency to a significant increase in the area of the abdominal cavity is determined. Significant differences between the indicators of girls and boys were determined in the 1st and 4th groups. A significant increase in the volume of the abdominal cavity is noted among girls in all groups, and among boys in the 2nd and 4th groups. Significant differences between girls and boys occurred in the 4th group.
Supporting agencies: The authors declare that there is no external funding for the exploration and analysis work.
About the Authors
A. S. Lozinsky
Orenburg State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Andrey S. Lozinskiy, Cand. Sci. (Med.), associate professor of Department
Orenburg
S. V. Chemezov
Orenburg State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Sergey V. Chemezov, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Head of the Department
Orenburg
References
1. Buzina A. M., Fateev I. N. Intravital anatomometric characteristics of the liver. Morfologiya = Morphology. 2017; (5): 70–73. (In Russ.).
2. Goryainova G. V., Padalitsa M. A., Evtushenko I. Ya., Kondrusik N. Yu., Vdovichenko V. Yu. Methods for determining the volume of human liver lobes as applied to anatomical resections. Zhurnal anatomii i gistopatologii = Journal of Anatomy and Histopathology. 2013; (4): 64–66. (In Russ.).
3. Izranov V. A., Ermakov A. V., Martinovich M. V., Kazantseva N. V., Stepanyan I. A. Modern possibilities for assessing the volume of the liver (ex vivo study). Ul'trazvukovaya i funktsional'naya diagnostika = [Ultrasound and functional diagnostics. 2017; (6): 11–24. (In Russ.).
4. Rozengauz E. V., Tyutin L. A., Nesterov D. V. Computed tomography of the liver. Analysis of twenty years of experience. Meditsinskaya vizualizatsiya = Medical imaging. 2013; (2): 20–28. (In Russ.).
5. Simonenko V. B., Gromov A. I., Rybchinskiy S. S. The effectiveness of echographic and computed tomographic morphometry of the liver. Meditsinskaya vizualizatsiya = Medical imaging. 2009; (1): 11–20. (In Russ.).
6. Chaplygina E. V., Gubar' A. S. The values of the volumetric parameters of the liver in connection with the type of physique and gender of the examined persons. Zhurnal anatomii i gistopatologii = Journal of Anatomy and Histopathology. 2017; (1): 101–104. doi: 10.18499/2225-7357-2017-6-1-101-104. (In Russ.).
7. Atasoy C., Ozyürek E. Prevalence and Types of Main and Right Portal Vein Branching Variations on MDCT. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2006; 187 (3): 676–681. doi.org/10.2214/ajr.05.0847.
8. Badran D. H., Kalbouneh H. M., Al-Hadidi M. T., Shatarat A. T., Tarawneh E. S., Hadidy A. M., Mahafza W. S. Ultrasonographic assessment of splenic volume and its correlation with body parameters in a Jordanian population. Saudi Medical Journal. 2015; 36 (8): 967–972. doi: 10.15537/smj.2015.8.11809.
9. Furuta T., Maeda E., Akai H., Hanaoka S., Yoshioka N., Akahane M., Watadani T., Ohtomo K. Hepatic segments and vasculature: projecting CT anatomy onto angiograms. Radiographics. 2009; 29 (7): 1–22.
10. Juza R. M., Pauli E. M. Clinical and surgical anatomy of the liver: a review for clinicians. Clinical Anatomy. 2014; 27 (5): 764–769. doi: 10.1002/ca.22350.
11. Koc Z., Oruzkurt L., Ulusan S. Portal vein variations: clinical implications and frequencies in routine abdominal multidetector CT. Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey). 2007; 13 (2): 75–80.
12. McFarland E. G., Pilgram T. K., Brink J. A. CT colonography: multiobserver diagnostic performance. Radiology. 2002; 225 (2): 380–390. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2252011625.
13. Prabhasavat K., Homgade C. Variation of hepatic artery by 3D reconstruction MDCT scan of liver in Siriraj Hospital. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand. 2008; 91 (11): 1748–1753.
14. Sahani D., Mehta A., Blake M., Prasad S., Harris G., Saini S. Preoperative Hepatic Vascular Evaluation with CT and MR Angiography: Implications for Surgery. Radio Graphics. 2004; 24 (5): 1367–1380. doi: 10.1148/rg.245035224.
15. Walas M. K., Skoczylas K., Gierbliński I. Errors and mistakes in the ultrasound diagnostics of the liver, gallbladder and bile ducts. Journal of Ultrasonography. 2012, 12 (51): 446-462. doi: 10.15557/JoU.2012.0032.
16. Zhuklina V. V., Gorbunov N. S., Samotesov P. A., Tikhonova N. V. Sexual characteristics of abdominal shapes and sizes of the anterior abdominal wall in elderly people. Sibirskiy meditsinskiy zhurnal = Siberian medical journal. 2011; (4): 108–110. (In Russ.).
17. Amarantov D. G., Fedorova N. A., Borodulina I. I., Vyguzova K. B. Dependence of the size of the abdominal cavity on the type of physique. Permskiy meditsinskiy zhurnal = Perm Medical Journal. 2014; (4): 70–74. (In Russ.).
18. Aliev R. A., Odishelashvili G. D. Study of the volume of the abdominal cavity in patients with ventral hernias before and after hernioplasty. Kubanskiy nauchnyy meditsinskiy vestnik = Kuban Scientific Medical Bulletin. 2015; (2): 7–9. (In Russ.).
19. Gorbunov N. S., Mishanin M. N., Zalevskiy A. A., Russkikh A. N., Gorbunov D. N., Shekhovtsova Yu. A., Shabokha A. D. Forms of the abdomen and the configuration of the anterior abdominal wall in peritonitis. Meditsina i obrazovanie v Sibiri = Medicine and education in Siberia. 2013; (1): 17. (In Russ.).
20. Zyuzyukina A. V. Body types and abdominal shape in women with acute appendicitis. Meditsina i obrazovanie v Sibiri = Medicine and education in Siberia. 2014; (3): 43. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Lozinsky A.S., Chemezov S.V. INDICATORS OF THE AREAS OF AXIAL SECTIONS AND THE VOLUME OF THE ABDOMINAL CAVITY OF CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS ACCORDING TO INTRAVITAL IMAGING. Astrakhan medical journal. 2022;17(4):93-99. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.48612/agmu/2022.17.4.93.99
Views:
247
Email this article 