Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription Access
MODERN POSSIBILITIES FOR THE ULTRASOUND DIAGNOSIS OF ADENOMYOSIS
https://doi.org/10.48612/agmu/2022.17.3.27.35
Abstract
The article presents modern data on ultrasound diagnosis of adenomyosis. Various echographiccriterias of genital endometriosis are highlighted. The diagnostic accuracy of two dimensional transvaginal ultrasound examination (2D-TV) compared with threedimensional transvaginal ultrasound examination (3D-TV) has been conducted. The data of domestic and foreign studies, systematic reviews and meta analyses regarding the modern possibilities of ultrasound diagnosis of adenomyosis are presented. The review describes the most informative noninvasive markers for the diagnosis of adenomyosis, including dopplerometric indicators of volumetric parameters of blood flow (VI, FI, VFI)
About the Authors
V. B. Tskhay
Federal Siberian Research Clinical Center under FMBA of Russia; Krasnoyarsk State Medical University, named after Prof. V.F. Voino-Yasenetsky
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
G. T. Mikailly
Krasnoyarsk State Medical University, named after Prof. V.F. Voino-Yasenetsky
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. A. Zhurkina
Federal Siberian Research Clinical Center under FMBA of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
G. N. Polstyanaya
Krasnoyarsk State Medical University, named after Prof. V.F. Voino-Yasenetsky
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
E. A. Shtokh
Federal Siberian Research Clinical Center under FMBA of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Krentel H., Cezar C., Becker S., Di SpiezioSardo A., Tanos V., Wallwiener M., De Wilde R. L. From Clinical Symptoms to MR Imaging: Diagnostic Steps in Adenomyosis. // BioMed research international. 2017. Vol. 2017: Article ID 1514029. doi: 10.1155/2017/1514029.
2. Andres M. P., Borrelli G. M., Ribeiro J., Baracat E. C., Abrão M. S., Kho R. M. Transvaginal Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Adenomyosis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis // Journal of minimally invasive gynecology. 2018. Vol. 25, no. 2. P. 257-264. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.08.653.
3. Marques A. L. S., Andres M. P., Mattos L. A., Gonçalves M. O., Baracat E. C., Abrão M. S. Association of 2D and 3D transvaginal ultrasound findings with adenomyosis in symptomatic women of reproductive age: a prospective study // Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2021. Vol. 76. e2981. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2021/e2981.
4. Озерская И. А., Щеглова Е. А., Белоусов М. А., Сиротинкина Е. В., Долгова Е. П., Девицкий А. А. Оценка гемодинамики матки у больных внутренним эндометриозом // Ультразвуковая и функциональная диагностика. 2014. Т 1, № 1. С. 37-46.
5. Rasmussen C. K., Hansen E. S., Ernst E., Dueholm M. Two and threedimensional transvaginal ultrasonography for diagnosis of adenomyosis of the inner myometrium // Reproductive biomedicine online. 2019. Vol. 38, no. 5. P. 750-760. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.12.033.
6. Decter D., Arbib N., Markovitz H., Seidman D. S., Eisenberg V. H. Sonographic Signs of Adenomyosis in Women with Endometriosis Are Associated with Infertility // Journal of clinical medicine. 2021. Vol. 10, no. 11. 2355. doi: 10.3390/jcm10112355.
7. Буланов М. Н. Ультразвуковая диагностика: курс лекций в трех томах. Т. 1. М.: Видар, 2010. 259 с.
8. Pinzauti S. Lazzeri L., Tosti C., Centini G., Orlandini C., Luisi S., Zupi E., Exacoustos C., Petraglia F. Transvaginal sonographic features of diffuse adenomyosis in 18-30 year old nulligravid women without endometriosis: association with symptoms // Ultrasound in obstetrics and gynecology. 2015. Vol. 46, no. 6. P. 730-736. doi: 10.1002/uog.14834.
9. Zannoni L., Ambrosio M., Raimondo D., Arena A., Del Forno S., Borghese G., Paradisi R., Seracchioli R. Question Mark Sign and Transvaginal Ultrasound Uterine Tenderness for the Diagnosis of Adenomyosis: A Prospective Validation // Journal of ultrasound in medicine. 2020. Vol. 39, no. 7. P. 1405-1412. doi: 10.1002/ jum.15237.
10. Van den Bosch T., Van Schoubroeck D. Ultrasound diagnosis of endometriosis and adenomyosis: State of the art. Best practice and research. Clinical obstetrics and gynaecology. 2018; Vol. 51. P. 16-24. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.01.013.
11. Hulka C. A., Hall D. A., McCarthy K., Simeone J. Sonographic findings in patients with adenomyosis: can sonography assist in predicting extent of disease? // AJR. American journal of roentgenology. 2002. Vol. 179, no. 2. P. 379-383. doi: 10.2214/ajr.179.2.1790379.
12. Tellum T., Omtvedt M., Naftalin J., Hirsch M., Jurkovic D. A systematic review of outcome reporting and outcome measures in studies investigating uterine sparing treatment for adenomyosis // Human reproduction open. 2021. Vol. 2021, no. 3: hoab030. doi: 10.1093 / hropen / hoab030.
13. Vercellini P., Consonni D., Dridi D., Bracco B., Frattaruolo M. P., Somigliana E. Uterine adenomyosis and in vitro fertilization outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis // Human reproduction. 2014. Vol. 29, no. 5. P. 964-977. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu041.
14. Демидов В. Н., Гус А. И., Адамян Л. В., Хачатрян А. К. Эхография органов малого таза у женщин. Выпуск 1. Эндометриоз: Практическое пособие. М.: Скрипто, 1997. 60 с.
15. Meredith S. M., Sanchez Ramos L., Kaunitz A. M. Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal sonography for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: systematic review and metaanalysis // American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2009. Vol. 201, no. 1. P. 107.e1-107.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.03.021.
16. Dartmouth K. A systematic review with meta-analysis: the common sonographic characteristics of adenomyosis // Ultrasound. 2014. Vol. 22, no. 3. P. 148-157. doi: 10.1177/1742271X14528837.
17. Bromley B., Shipp T. D., Benacerraf B. Adenomyosis: sonographic findings and diagnostic accuracy // Journal of ultrasound in medicine. 2000. Vol. 19, no. 8. P. 529-534. doi: 10.7863/jum.2000.19.8.529.
18. Dueholm, M. Transvaginal ultrasound for diagnosis of adenomyosis: a review // Best practice and research. Clinical obstetrics and gynaecology. 2006. Vol. 20, no. 4. P. 569-582. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2006.01.005.
19. Exacoustos C., Brienza L., Di Giovanni A., Szabolcs B., Romanini M. E., Zupi E., Arduini D. Adenomyosis: Threedimensional sonographic findings of the junctional zone and correlation with histology // Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2011. Vol. 37, no. 4. P. 471-479. doi: 10.1002 / uog.8900.
20. Tanos V., Lingwood L., Balami S. Junctional Zone Endometrium Morphological Characteristics and Functionality: Review of the Literature // Gynecologic and obstetric investigation. 2020. Vol. 85, no. 2. P. 107-117. doi: 10.1159/000505650.
21. Dueholm M., Lundorf E. Transvaginal ultrasound or MRI for diagnosis of adenomyosis // Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2007. Vol. 19, no. 6. P. 505-512. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(01)01962-8.
22. Tellum T., Nygaard S., Lieng M. Noninvasive Diagnosis Adenomyosis: A Structured Review and Metaanalysis Diagnostic Accuracy in Imaging // Journal of minimally invasive gynecology. 2020. Vol. 27, no. 2. P. 408-418. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.11.001.
23. Rasmussen C. K., Hansen E. S., Dueholm M.Interrater agreement in the diagnosis of adenomyosis by 2 and 3 dimensional transvaginal ultrasonography // Journal of ultrasound in medicine. 2019. Vol. 38, no. 3. P. 657-666. doi: 10.1002/jum.14735.
24. Naftalin J., Jurkovic D. The endometrial myometrial junction: a fresh look at a busy crossing // Ultrasound in obstetrics and gynecology. 2009. Vol. 34, no. 1. P. 1-11. doi: 10.1002/uog.6432.
25. Liu L., Li W., Leonardi M., Condous G., Da Silva Costa F., Mol B. W., Wong L. Diagnostic Accuracy of Transvaginal Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Adenomyosis: Systematic Review and Meta Analysis and Review of Sonographic Diagnostic Criteria // Journal of ultrasound in medicine. 2021. Vol. 40, no. 11. P. 2289-2306. doi: 10.1002/jum.15635.
26. Choi E. J., Cho S. B., Lee S. R., Lim Y. M., Jeong K., Moon H. S., Chung H.Comorbidity of gynecological and nongynecological diseases with adenomyosis and endometriosis // Obstetrics and gynecology science. 2017. Vol. 60, no. 6. P. 579-86. doi: 10.5468/ogs.2017.60.6.579.
27. Corona L. E., Swenson C. W., Sheetz K. H., Shelby G., Berger M. B., Pearlman M. D., Campbell D. A. Jr, DeLancey J. O., Morgan D. M. Use of other treatments before hysterectomy for benign conditions in a statewide hospital collaborative // American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2015. Vol. 212, no. 3. P. 304.e1-304.e7. doi: 10.1016/j. ajog.2014.11.031.
28. Kara Bozkurt D., Bozkurt M., Cil A. S., Barut M. U., Ersahin A. A., Çalıskan E. Concomitant use of transvaginal sonography and Doppler indices improve diagnosis of adenomyosis // Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. 2017. Vol. 37, no. 7. P. 888-895. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2016.1256952.
29. Sharma K., Bora M. K., Venkatesh B. P., Barman P., Roy S. K., Jayagurunathan U., Sellamuthu E., Moidu F. Role of 3D Ultrasound and Doppler in Differentiating Clinically Suspected Cases of Leiomyoma and Adenomyosis of Uterus // Journal of clinical and diagnostic research. 2015. Vol. 9, no. 4. P. 8-12. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/12240.5846.
30. Anicic R., Djukic M., Rakic S., Vasiljevic M, Dimitrijevic D, Milicevic S. Evaluation of uteroovarian hemodynamics in relation to fertility and stage of endometriosis // Clinical and experimental obstetrics & gynecology. 2012. Vol. 39, no. 4. P. 526-528.
31. Yakovenko K., Tamm T., Yakovenko Y. A stady of uterine hemodynamics using threedimensional power Doppler sonography in patients with adenomyosis // Georgian medical news. 2018. no. 285. P. 21-27.
32. Luciano D. E., Exacoustos C., Albrecht L., LaMonica R., Proffer A., Zupi E., Luciano A. A. Threedimensional ultrasound in diagnosis of adenomyosis: histologic correlation with ultrasound targeted biopsies of the uterus // Journal of minimally invasive gynecology. 2013. Vol. 20, no. 6. P. 803-810. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.05.002.
33. Bazot M., Daraï E. Role of transvaginalsonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of uterine adenomyosis // Fertility and sterility. 2018. Vol. 109, no. 3. P. 389-397. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.01.024.
34. Lazzeri L., Morosetti G., Centini G., Monti G., Zupi E., Piccione E., Exacoustos C. A sonographic classification of adenomyosis: interobserver reproducibility in the evaluation of type and degree of the myometrialinvolvement // Fertility and sterility. 2018. Vol. 110, no. 6. P. 1154-1161. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.06.031.
35. Tamhane N., McDowell M., Oliva M., Tanner J. P., Hochberg L., Baker M., Imudia A. N., Mikhail E. Association between Preoperative Adenomyosis Detection Rate during Pelvic Ultrasonography and the Specialty of the Reading Physician // Journal of minimally invasive gynecology. 2020. Vol. 27, no. 2. P. 504-509. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.04.015.
36. Wang J., Movilla P., Chen T., Wang J., Morales B., Williams A., Reddy H., Tavcar J., Morris S., Loring M., Isaacson K. Concomitant Adenomyosis among Patients with Asherman Syndrome // Journal of minimally invasive gynecology. 2021. Vol. 28, no. 2. P. 358-65.doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.07.011.
37. Vinci V., Saldari M., Sergi M. E. Bernardo S., Rizzo G., Grazia Porpora M., Catalano C., Manganaro L. MRI, US or real time virtual sonography in the evaluation of adenomyosis? // La Radiologia medica. 2017. Vol. 122, no. 5. P. 361-368.doi: 10.1007/ s11547-017-0729-7.
38. Ebert A. D., Макаренко Т. А., Цхай В. Б., Никифорова Д. Е., Магалов И. С., Пашов А. И. Альтернативные методы лечения эндометриоза: Ресвератрол и его комбинация с гормонотерапией // Сибирское медицинское обозрение. 2018; № 2 (110). P. 106-108.
39. Fraser M. A., Agarwal S., Chen I., Singh S. S. Routine vs. expert-guided transvaginal ultrasound in the diagnosis of endometriosis: a retrospective review // Abdominal imaging. 2015. Vol. 40, no. 3. P. 587-594. doi: 10.1007/s00261-014-0243-5.
40. Harmsen M. J., Van den Bosch T., de Leeuw R. A., Dueholm M., Exacoustos C., Valentin L., Hehenkamp W. J. K., Groenman F., De Bruyn C., Rasmussen C., Lazzeri L., Jokubkiene L., Jurkovic D., Naftalin J., Tellum T., Bourne T., Timmerman D., Huirne J. A. F. Consensus on revised definitions of Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) features of adenomyosis: results of a modified Delphi procedure // Ultrasound in obstetrics and gynecology. 2022. Vol. 60, no. 1. P. 118-131. doi: 10.1002/uog.24786.
Review
For citations:
Tskhay V.B., Mikailly G.T., Zhurkina A.A., Polstyanaya G.N., Shtokh E.A. MODERN POSSIBILITIES FOR THE ULTRASOUND DIAGNOSIS OF ADENOMYOSIS. Astrakhan medical journal. 2022;17(3):27-35. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.48612/agmu/2022.17.3.27.35
Views:
295
Email this article 